JEWISH HAPPINESS, RUSSIAN TEARS...
A Hellenic Nationalist comrade made me aware of the existence of this letter on the web, and as far as I know the translators are Jewish. No one I know can qualify to vouch for this english translation. The original is said be found in Russian in "Orthodox World"
******************************************
JEWISH HAPPINESS, RUSSIAN TEARS...
Representatives of the Russian community request that the Prosecutor
General of RF [Russian Federation] initiate a suppression of the unpunished propagation of the Jewish national and religious extremism
The Honorable Prosecutor General!
On the 18th of December of 2003, President V. V. Putin of the RF [the
Russian Federation] cited the following numbers during a television
interview to the nation:
In 1999 four people were convicted under article 282 of UK RF
([Criminal Codex of the Russian Federation]) of "causing national
dissension", in 2000 - ten, and in 2003 "more than 60 were
prosecuted, more than twenty reached the courtroom, and about 17-20
were convicted" (V. Putin: conversation with Russia, 18 of December,
2003. M., 2003. p. 53).
WHO IS SHOUTING "CATCH THE THIEF"?
The overwhelming majority of these cases are initiated by Jewish
leaders or organizations, accusing their defendants of "anti-
semitism".. And, the overwhelming majority of those accused and
convicted consider themselves Russian patriots. Now among their
number is a well-known independent politician and writer, former head
of GosKomPechat [Russian Federation State Committee for the Press]
B.S. Mironov.
We recognize that the statements of Russian patriots towards the Jews
are frequently of sharply negative nature, too emotional,
unacceptable in the public discussion, and have been treated by the
courts as extremism. However, at the court trials noted above, the
reason of this sharpness and the origin of extremism in this
international conflict has never been examined.
But the main question, which is necessary for the prosecution and the
court to answer is whether the sharply negative opinions of Jews by
Russian patriots do correspond to the essential truth, toward which
they are directed? If they do not correspond - then the discussion
can deal with the humiliation of Jews and with the causing of
religious and national dissension. If they do correspond - then such
opinions are vindicated and, independent of their emotionalism, they
cannot be qualified as humiliating, causing dissension, etc. (for
example, to call a regular person "a felon" - is humiliating for him;
but to call a street thief "a felon" - is truthfully stating a fact).
Aside from this, since there are two parties to this international
conflict (the accusing and the defending), it is necessary to be
determine which of the sides begun this conflict first and is
responsible for it, and whether the actions of the accused can be
considered self-defense against the acts of aggression of the
accusing side?
We want to assure You, Mr. Prosecutor General, that there is a large
quantity of universally recognized facts and sources on these
questions in the entire world, on the basis of which it is possible
to draw an indisputable conclusion: the negative opinions by the
Russian patriots of qualities and actions typical of the Jews do
correspond to the truth; moreover these actions are not by chance,
but are prescribed in Judaism and are practiced for two millenia.
Thus, the incriminating statements and publications of the Russian
patriots against the Jews are considered self-defense, which is not
always correct, but is morally justified.
THE MORAL OF JEWISH FASCISM
As a proof we would like to bring Your attention to the book called
the "Kitzur Shulchan Oruch", officially published in 2001 in Moscow
by the Congress of Jewish Religion Organizations and Unions in Russia
(CJROU). This is a condensed edition of the Jewish codex of laws
called the "Shulchan Oruch", composed several centuries ago on the
basis of the Talmud and is obligatory to this day. In the
introduction to the book, the head of CJROU, Rabbi Zinoviy Kogan
makes a frank acknowledgement (emphasis added by us):
"The editorial council of the CJROU considered it necessary to omit
some halachik rules in this translation. ..., the placement of which
in a Russian-language edition might be perceived as the unprovoked
insult by the population of Russia which does notadhere to Judaism.
The eader who wishes to read the "Kitzur Shulchan Oruch" in full, is
invited to attend a yeshiva, where he can study this and many other
holy books in the original".
Thus, one of the leaders of the Russian Jewish community recognizes
some of the laws in the Jewish codex of law as insulting to the non-
Jewish populace of Russia, yet he considers it possible to invite his
kinsmen to study these insults in yeshivas - Jewish schools financed
from the [Federal] government and local budgets. Additionally, even
in this censored edition we find the following laws:
- In "Laws About Idolatry" it is indicated that "the figure of two
crossed sticks, to which they worship, is forbidden to the use" -
meaning that Christianity is considered idolatry and all laws about
dealings with idolaters ("akumam") imply primarely Orthodox
Christians in Russia (which is a predominantly Christian Orthodox
country).
- A law which states that upon seeing "a house of idolatry" (i.e,
temple) one must pronounce towards it a curse: "G-d will uproot the
house of the proud", and at the sight of the destroyed temple to
announce "The G-d of vengeance appeared!". Furthermore, there is also
a version of this law stating: "some assume that the discussion deals
with the houses of non-Jews, which live in peace, calmness and
wealth" (pp. 389-390).
- Comparison of a non-Jews to excrements (pp 47 and 48).
- A prohibition to train non-Jews in crafts (p. 390).
- "A Jewess should not assist a non-Jew in childbirth" (p. 390).
- "If a man has a debt to non-Jew, but the creditor died, he has the
right to refuse to pay to the creditor's son, if the son does not
know accurately whether the Jew owed money to his father" (p. 405).
- In regard to calculations of money "if a non-Jew made a mistake, it
is permitted to benefit from his error" (p. 406).
- "It is forbidden to give over a Jew into the hands of a non-Jew, if
there is a concern about the life of Jew or his property; and it is
irrelevant whether this is being done as a result of any action by
words; and it is forbidden to report him or to indicate the places
where his property is hidden" (p. 408) - we would like to note that
this concerns the behavior obligatory for Jews during a court case
and in a court of law.
- Of course, within the 13 major principles of Judaism it is
obligatory to await a Jewish world ruler, who will place the Jews to
rule over all other nations of the world: "Unconditionally I believe
in the arrival Of Moshiach, and, although he does tarry, nevertheless
each day I will await it" (p. 485). - In the books of the [Russian]
Orthodox Church this expected ruler of the world is identified as the
Antichrist, about whom a warning was given by Jesus Christ (John
5:43), the apostle Paul (2 Thessalonians, 2), the holy fathers of the
Church. This is the important and integral part of the [Russian]
Orthodox tradition.
In the prefacen to this book, the head of CJROU writes that "the
Talmud is an unsurpassed monument of the Jewish genius", and this
extract of its morals, "Kitzur Shulchan Oruch" - "a compendum of the
Jewish civilization of our time... This book is very necessary for
you. You can act according to what is written in it, and be assured
that have fulfilled the will of G-d".
And the chief rabbi of Russia, A. Shayevich, notes in the
preface: "Interest in this book has exceeded our our most daring
expectations. We have received a huge quantity of thankful responses
from very different people during this time. An even larger quantity
of letters contain imperative requests to help with the purchase of
this publication".
We assume that already on the basis of this single official Jewish
publication and article 282 of UK RF [Criminal Codex of the Russian
Federation], the law enforcement agencies should have suppressed the
propagation of a religion among the Jews kindling the hatred for rest
of the Russian populace. All the more, if we glance into "the full
volume of this unsurpassed monument of Judaic morals" - the "Shulchan
Aruch", studied in yeshivas.
Lets utilize its translation from a Jewish Amsterdam edition, made by
a judicial expert, a scientist and a Hebraist, doctor K. Ecker for
the court trial in Germany in 1883 (Dr. K. Ecker. Der "Judenspiegel"
im Lichte der Wahrheit, - eine wissentschaftliche Untersuchung.
Paderborn. 1984; Russian translation: Dr. K. Ecker. "Jewish Mirror"
in light of the truth. Scientific research. M., 1906).
The Jews begun this law case in connection with the fact that one of
their kinsmen (Yustus-Briman), after conversion to Christianity,
published the anti-human laws of the "Shulhan Oruch" and of the
Talmud. However, the court vindicated the publisher after finding
that the translation corresponded to the original. Dr. Ecker only
corrected small inaccuracies - the text corrected by him will be
brought down below in fragments with the indication of precise Jewish
sources (being based on the confidence of the qualification of German
expert-Hebraist and the German court).
- "His [the non-Jew's] seed is considered as the seed of cattle"
(Tosefta - addition to the Talmud Of Ketubot, 3b). "For [the dead]
servants and mainservants ... they do not say the words of comfort to
those remaining, but it is necessary to say to him [to the Jew, the
owner]: "May G-d recover your loss", in exactly the same way just as
they tell a man, when either his bull or donkey dies" (Yoreh Deah 377-
1)
- "It is forbidden to save them [the non-Jews], when they are close
to death. For example, when you see, that one of them fell in the
sea, do not rescue him, even if he wants to pay... It is permitted to
experiment with medicine on a non-Jew to determine whether it is
useful or not" (Yoreh Deah 158-1).
- "The money of non-Jews is consided as if it is unowned, and anyone
who grabs it first can take it". "With respect to a non-Jew there is
no lying" (Hoshen Mishpat 156-5, Hagah; 227-26; 348-2, Hagah).
- "When a Jew robbed a non-Jew, and he [the Jew] is being forced to
swear, he must declare in his heart the oath as ineffective, because
he is being forced" (Yoreh Deah, 329-1, Hagah). NOTE: this again
concerns the behavior of Jews during a court case and in a courtroom,
- "If it is established about someone that he betrayed a Jew or his
money to non-Jew three times, then it is necessary to seek out a way
and methods to kill him". "The expenses necessary for the removal of
the traitor from this world is liable on all local residents" (Hoshen
Mishpat 388-15 and -16).
- "A traitor - it is permitted to kill him at any place, even in our
time. To kill him is permissible before he manages to inform [liable
to bring a loss "either bodily or monetary even if it is small]...
and anyone, who is the first to kill him acquires merit" (Hoshen
Mishpat 388-10).
- "A Jew-free-thinker, i.e. someone who performs the religious rites
of the non-Jews ... to kill all of these is a good deed. When there
is authority to kill them, they are publically executed by sword; but
if not, then they must be enmeshed in every way possible in order to
cause them death. For example, when you see, that one of them fell
into the well and in the well there are stairs, then hurry to take
out them out saying: "I needed it to take my son off the roof, and I
will bring it right back" and etc" (Hoshen 425-5).
PROVOCATEURS AND HATERS OF HUMANKIND
It is notable that even the above mention orders to kill are not -
are to this day not theory but practice. Thus, the former chairman of
the Kharkov Jewish community, E. Khodos, published proofs ("The Axe
above the Orthodoxy, or Who Killed Father Menya". Kharkov, 1999)
charing the members of the Jewish Chabad movement in the murder in
1990 of a Jewish priest, Father Alexsander Menya (which "perfomed the
religious rites of the non-Jews" and dreamed about the creation of
the "Jewish Orthodox Church", which is also considered a criminal
offense according to the laws of state of Israel). But these
testimonies did not interest the authorities of the RF [the Russian
Federation] and instead it was proposed that the criminals can be
found among the community of the Russian anti-semites.
Let us emphasize, that most of anti-Jewish actions in the entire
world are constantly arranged by the Jews themselves with the
provocative purpose - in order to invoke punitive measures against
patriots. In Russia, the most famous is the case of Norinskiy, which
in 1988 sent antisemitic leaflets on behalf of the
organization "Pamyat", in order to compel the authorities to repress
it; he was helped by his kisnman, editor in chief of the
journal "Znamya" G. Baklanov, who published the leaflet in a half-
million printing. Only after this provocation was discovered
("Znamya" No. 10, 1988; "Pravda", 19.11.88; "Komsomolskya Pravda",
24.11.88; "Ogonek" No. 9, 1989).
Among the more recent cases, we can mention a strange series of the
reports of vandalism in 1998-1999: On 13 of May, 1998, in Moscow
there was a night explosion of synagogue in Mariynoy Rosche (a wall
was damaged), during the same day not far from the synagogue v
Otradnom there was an incident with "a burning canister of gasoline",
and in Irkutsk "a Jewish cemetery was vandalised". Of course, the
world media raised a loud rackus and all of these were uproveningly
thought of being caused by certain Russian Nazis ("Nezavisimya
Gazeta", 15.5.98).
But when soon after this, in 1999, a synagogue was destroyed in
Birobidzhan and a court established that Jews themselves hired a man
for this ("Radonezh", 1999, No. 15-16), the democratic media was
silent.
Based on the cited laws and practices of Jewish behavior is not
difficult to understand, why notorious "antisemitism" was a constant
companion of the Jews among all nations, i.e., the nonacceptance of
of Judaic morals. For this very reason Jews did not have an equality
of rights in Christian states and only attained it only as a result
of anti-monarchist bourgeois revolutions.
And in the Russian Empire ,Jews, after the useless attempts of the
tsarist government to make them "the same as everyone else", were
deprived in the 19th century of the equality of rights: not because
they were Jews by blood (the empire was multinational); not because
they were non-Christian (so were Moslems, Buddhists and so forth.);
but because the Jewish religion is anti-Christian and human-hating,
reaching as far as ritual murders. Many cases of this extremism were
proven in court (for example, see a study by a well-known scholar V.
I. Dal "Rozyskaniye O Ubiyenii Yevremyimi Christianskih Mladentsev i
Ispolzovanya Ih Krovi" [Investigation of Murders of Christian Babies
by Jews and the Use of Their Blood], St. Petersburg, 1884).
To all of this, we can also add words from the prayer Of "Shfoch",
which which the Jews say on the eve of Passover, asking that their "G-
d" "destroys from under the sun" all other nations.
JUDAIC AGGRESSIVENESS AS A FORM OF SATANISM
The spiritual reason for this misanthropy is explained in the Gospels
through the words of Christ about the Jewish spiritual leaders,
rejecting the son of the God: "Your father is the devil, and you want
to fulfill the lusts of your father; he was a murderer of man from
the beginning" (John 8:19,44).
This is the accepted (in the [Russian] Orthodoxy) explanation of
Jewish aggressiveness as a form of satanism. It was voiced by well-
known philosophers-intellectuals, who cannot be suspected in the
antisemitism. For example, A. F. Losev ("Istochnik". M., 1996, No. 4.
S. 117-122), Father Pavel Florenskiy (see the book V. V.
Rozanov "Saxharna", publishing house "Respublika", 1998, p. 360) and
Father Sergiy Bulgakov: the Jews who rejected Christ became "the
laboratory of all kind of all kinds of spiritual defects, poisoning
the world and in particular the Christians" ("Vestnik RXD". Parism
1973, No. 108-110, p. 72). Even Judeo-Christian Father Alexsander
Men, who was fighting against "antisemitism", asserted that the Jew,
who rejects Christianity, "betrays himself and easily falls to in the
authority of the dark forces" (journal "Jews in the USSR", 1975, No.
11).
This, unfortunately has occurred with the larger part of the Jewish
people (in contrast to the smaller part which accepted Christianity).
But they do not want to realize this, and considers that this
statement of truth by Christ and the [Russian] Orthodox Christians
after him "insulting" to the Jews. Jewish plaintiffs frequently
direct their charge of "antisemitism" against this essential part of
the Orthodox dogma, requiring its practical prohibition (as in the
case with the textbook "Bases of Orthodox Culture").
However, we cannot agree with the prohibition on the [Russian]
Orthodox knowledge about the purpose of history as the fight between
the forces of good (on the side of the Church) and forces of evil (on
the side of the opposite religion, that is preparing the reign of
Antichrist).
Following the precepts of the [Russian] Orthodox fathers of the
Church, we cannot follow the forced false understanding of tolerance
as humbleness before the sin, the evil, the heresies and in this case
satanism. From the respect for the image of God, placed into every
person, and for the salvation of his soul, a Christian must frankly
tell to to Jews their dangerous deviation from the truth into
satanism - from a Christian point of view in this lies the
manifestation of authentic love for people, BUT "tolerant" indulgence
to heresies and to satanism only contributes to their spiritual loss.
And under their strong pressure - also of their many victims.
We should note immediately to answer a the possible objection that
the Russian patriots, who charge the Jews, do not always
differentiate between the religious and non-religious Jews,
especially since majority of them are not considered themselves
religious and do not study the "Shulchan Oruch". However, many
generations of the self-contained life of the Jews among the other
nations (in this there was the sense of Jewish saying of "a state
within the state" - see the books of the Jewish
authors: "Antisemitism in the Ancient World", S. Luria and "Kniga
Kagala", Y. Brofman) led to the fact that the morals of the "Shulchan
Oruch" have became a part of Jewish national self-consciousness even
in its secular form. This conclusion drawn by a known Jewish writer
and sociologist X. Arendt:
"Precisely in the process of secularization a real Jewish chauvinism
was born... The idea about the uniqueness of the Jews became... an
idea, that the Jews are supposedly the salt of the earth. From this
point on, the old religious concept of uniqueness ceased to be the
essence of Judaism and became the essence of Jewish people"
("Antisemitism", "Syntaxsis", Paris, No. 26, 1989).
This "real Jewish chauvinism" and unceremoniousness in the spirit of
the "Shulchan Oruch" clearly appeared in the course of the
destruction of the USSR and the post-communist reforms in our
country, and were expressed as in the illegal awarding to the
government ownership both in the illegal aquisition of government
property as "unowned" and in the composition of the new ruling
class: "the government it is full of Jews", admits Rabbi A. Shayevich
("NG-Figuri I Litza", 1998, No. 16). Thus, their corresponding
influence on the life of the country proved to be completely
disproportionately to their number (0.16 % according to the last
census) to the detriment of the interests of all other nationalities
of the country and especially the country-forming Russian people.
THE JEWISH REVOLUTION
A famout Jewish pamphleteer L. Radzikhovskiy calls this a "democratic-
capitalist revolution"... "Jewish and near-Jewish intelligentsia in
Russia, which was one of the main carriers of the western-liberal
ideology, became the ideologist of this revolution". Therefore "Jews
have a larger specific weight in the Russian policy and business,
than in the policy and business of any other Christian country". This
Radzikhovskiy calls "Jewish happiness", which is also the title of
his newspaper article ("Novoye Ruskoye Slovo", 17.1.96).
The Jewish oligarchs themselves frankly described on Israeli
television (Channel 2, 3.10.96) the sources of their "happiness" in
the revolution perfomed by them (the italics are ours):
The degree of corruption in Russia fully corresponds to the degree of
changes in Russia. I do not think that in the hands of the officials
of Israel... there is an ability to redistribute riches costing tens,
hundreds of millions and billions... this was - no one's, this was -
the state, this was property of all! Thus, the officials had the
ability to decide by one stroke: this belongs to you or to someone
else... A good battle, which led to the result, which we have today"
(Berezovskiy).
"Such income and such profits, as the ones that could be earned in
Russia, could not be earned anywhere else... The large part of
capital there, 50 percent, belong to Jewish business " (Malkin, now
the member of the presidium of Russian Jewish Congress).Gusinskiy,
first Chairman of the Russian Jewish congress, in the same program
named a number of reasons for the Jewish luck - "harshness", "with
less rules: more rule of force, more rule of aggression".
"For the first time in a thousand years from the moment of the
settling of Jews in Russia we obtained real authority in this
country", says another Jewish writer, E. Topol, in "An open letter To
Berezovsky, Gusinsky, Smolensky, Khodorkovsky and Other Oligarchs"
("Argumenti I Fakti", 1998, No. 38). With this, Topol and other
sensitive Jews (for example, Y. Nudelman - see. "Sovetskaya Rosiya",
20.6.2002) emphasize that the destructive and self-interested policy
of the Jewish oligarchs, which degrades Russian people, provokes the
hostility of the Russian people to the Jews. This obviousness was
even noted by the ambassador of the Kingdom of Belgium in RF [the
Russian Federation], A. Merne, in a concluding report about his work,
sent out to all foreign embassies in Moscow and employees of the
diplomatic sector, during September 2004 before his departure from
Moscow.
We request the General Procurator's Office to consider this opinion
of Topol and Nudelman as the acknowledgement of the responsibility of
the accusing (Jewish) side for the contemporary aggravation of the
Russian-Jewish conflict.
More so, that for the retention of illegally seized "unowned"
government property and to maintain its authority, this ruling class
conducts a directed policy of the lowering of national morals and
removal of intellectual values, attempting to convert the populace
into an animal mass without any faith and traditions - so more
simpler to govern and with ability to more easily suppress its
resistance.
In particular, it was specifically the Jews who showed furious
resistance to the teaching in schools of "Osnov Pravoslavnay Kulturi"
[a textbook called the "Bases of Russian Orthodox Culture] and
specifically on the initiative of the Jews, it is forbidden to us,
the country-forming Russian people, to indicate our nationality in a
passport. The chief rabbi R. F. Shayevich in an interview with
the "Los Angeles Times" confirmed that it was the Jews who insisted
on the cancellation of the nationality section [in the passport], and
the reason for this was explained that"the Jews acquired high
positions in the administration". I.e., even they themselves realize
the idea about nationality that is accepted among the non-Jews, and
therefore they attempt to hide their nationality - this alone speaks
volumes.
Among the other numerous examples of removal of intellectual values
we cannot but turn your attention, Mr. Prosecutor General, to the
policy of the Minister of culture Mr. Shvydkog (he is now in charge
of the government agency for the matters of culture) and his TV
program "Cultural Revolution", in which Russian patriotism and
[Russian] Orthodox traditions are regularly degraded, in which he
propagandizes obscenities and the idea that "sex is the engine of
culture" (7.3.2002). All protests of the Russian community against
the scandalous, and in the essence provocative activity of this "main
cultural man of the country" proved to be futile.
Additionally, Mr. Shvydkog and his colleagues have at their disposal
the central channels of Russian television, and in the hands of the
defending [Russian] Orthodox patriots there is only small print runs
available, for which they are pursued and judged - this inequality of
abilities can also involuntarily lead them to extra emotionalism,
especially when rebuffing blasphemous and insolent anti-Russian
actions of persons of Jewish origin.
But this emotionalism of cornered defending side, should not be mixed
up with the aggressive attacking emotionalism. The aggression is not
permitted for a [Russian] Orthodox person, but he is called to
protect his people and its sacred relics - an example to this was
given by Christ himself, who banished merchants by whip from the
temple which they defiled/
WHAT IS PERMITTED FOR WHOM?
By comparison with the statements of the accused Russian patriots
much the more aggressive statements of Jews with respect to the non-
Jews are printed in Jewish newspapers published in the RF [Russian
Federation]. For example, in the organ of Russian Jewish
Congress, "The Jewish News" (2002, No. 16, p. 9), the deputy of the
[Israeli] Knesset A. Lieberman called to the forcefully expell
Palestinians from Israel. Nevertheless, the Palestinians - in spite
of the resolutions of the UN Security Council! - are not only being
banished from their native land (4 million refugees), but their
activists together with familiar are being killed - this is how
the "Shulchan Oruch" manifests itself in the official government
policy of the state of Israel.
And the Jewry of the RF [the Russian Federation] supports it: the
Russian Jewish Congress among its goals declares, that it "carries
out actions of solidarity with the people of Israel, political
lobbying of interests of Israel" ("Jewish News", 2002, No. 15, p. 5).
This purpose is also pursued by the State Institute of Study of
Israel and the Middle East, whose leader Satanovskiy is
simultaneously heading the Russian Jewish congress.
Jewish communities in all countries are carring out a
similar "political lobbying" of interests of the international Jewry
to the detriment of their resident countries, and especially in THE
USA - this state became the tool of achieving the global goals of
Jewry. And the racism of their "Shulchan Oruch" they try to disguise
by the forestalling charges of antisemitism (i.e., allegedly racial
hatred) to all who do not agree with their morals, their actions,
their wars.
But this substitution of concepts is a crude forgery, which must be
obvious to any impartial judge. It is possible to say that the entire
democratic world today is under the monetary and political control by
the international Jewry, which is something famous bankers (Z.
Attali, etc.) are openly proud of. And we do not wish that our
Russia, against the revival of which a preventive permanent war
without the rules is being wages, end up among such non-free
countries.
Therefore, we, both for purposes of the protection of our Fatherland
and personal self-defense, are forced to turn to you, Mr. Prosecutor
General, with the imperative request within the shortest period to
verify the scandalous facts presented above and, if they are
confirmed, on the basis of the corresponding articles UK RF [Criminal
Codex of the Russian Federation], the law "About opposition to
extremist activity" (2002) and article. 13 of the Constitution of the
RF [the Russian Federation] ("the establishment and the activities of
public associations, whose aims and actions are directed at ... the
incitement of social, racial, national and religious strife shall be
prohibited.") to officially begin proceedings about the prohibition
in our country of all religious and national Jewish associations as
extremist. The persons, responsible for assignment to these
associations of state and municipal property, privileges and state
financing, we request also to be summoned, disregarding of the posts
occupied by them.
Klikov V.M., Nationally honored artist of Russia
Krutov A.N., Deputy of the State Duma, the editor in chief of the
journal "Ruskiy Dom"
Senin A.A., editor in chief of the newspaper "Ruskiy Vestnik"
Nazarov M.V., leader of publishing house "Ruskaya Ideya"
Dushenov K.Y., editor in chief of newspaper "Rus Pravoslavnya"
Khatyushin V. V., deputy editor in chief "Molodaya Gvardia"
Dzikovitskiy A.V. , editor in chief of the newspaper "Kazachiy Vzglad"
Basov T.G. , editor in chief of newspaper "Marsh Slavanki"
Kalent'ev V.F. , editor in chief of the newspaper "Otchizna"
and others (a total of more than 500 signatures, among them 19
Deputies of the State Duma)
******************************************
JEWISH HAPPINESS, RUSSIAN TEARS...
Representatives of the Russian community request that the Prosecutor
General of RF [Russian Federation] initiate a suppression of the unpunished propagation of the Jewish national and religious extremism
The Honorable Prosecutor General!
On the 18th of December of 2003, President V. V. Putin of the RF [the
Russian Federation] cited the following numbers during a television
interview to the nation:
In 1999 four people were convicted under article 282 of UK RF
([Criminal Codex of the Russian Federation]) of "causing national
dissension", in 2000 - ten, and in 2003 "more than 60 were
prosecuted, more than twenty reached the courtroom, and about 17-20
were convicted" (V. Putin: conversation with Russia, 18 of December,
2003. M., 2003. p. 53).
WHO IS SHOUTING "CATCH THE THIEF"?
The overwhelming majority of these cases are initiated by Jewish
leaders or organizations, accusing their defendants of "anti-
semitism".. And, the overwhelming majority of those accused and
convicted consider themselves Russian patriots. Now among their
number is a well-known independent politician and writer, former head
of GosKomPechat [Russian Federation State Committee for the Press]
B.S. Mironov.
We recognize that the statements of Russian patriots towards the Jews
are frequently of sharply negative nature, too emotional,
unacceptable in the public discussion, and have been treated by the
courts as extremism. However, at the court trials noted above, the
reason of this sharpness and the origin of extremism in this
international conflict has never been examined.
But the main question, which is necessary for the prosecution and the
court to answer is whether the sharply negative opinions of Jews by
Russian patriots do correspond to the essential truth, toward which
they are directed? If they do not correspond - then the discussion
can deal with the humiliation of Jews and with the causing of
religious and national dissension. If they do correspond - then such
opinions are vindicated and, independent of their emotionalism, they
cannot be qualified as humiliating, causing dissension, etc. (for
example, to call a regular person "a felon" - is humiliating for him;
but to call a street thief "a felon" - is truthfully stating a fact).
Aside from this, since there are two parties to this international
conflict (the accusing and the defending), it is necessary to be
determine which of the sides begun this conflict first and is
responsible for it, and whether the actions of the accused can be
considered self-defense against the acts of aggression of the
accusing side?
We want to assure You, Mr. Prosecutor General, that there is a large
quantity of universally recognized facts and sources on these
questions in the entire world, on the basis of which it is possible
to draw an indisputable conclusion: the negative opinions by the
Russian patriots of qualities and actions typical of the Jews do
correspond to the truth; moreover these actions are not by chance,
but are prescribed in Judaism and are practiced for two millenia.
Thus, the incriminating statements and publications of the Russian
patriots against the Jews are considered self-defense, which is not
always correct, but is morally justified.
THE MORAL OF JEWISH FASCISM
As a proof we would like to bring Your attention to the book called
the "Kitzur Shulchan Oruch", officially published in 2001 in Moscow
by the Congress of Jewish Religion Organizations and Unions in Russia
(CJROU). This is a condensed edition of the Jewish codex of laws
called the "Shulchan Oruch", composed several centuries ago on the
basis of the Talmud and is obligatory to this day. In the
introduction to the book, the head of CJROU, Rabbi Zinoviy Kogan
makes a frank acknowledgement (emphasis added by us):
"The editorial council of the CJROU considered it necessary to omit
some halachik rules in this translation. ..., the placement of which
in a Russian-language edition might be perceived as the unprovoked
insult by the population of Russia which does notadhere to Judaism.
The eader who wishes to read the "Kitzur Shulchan Oruch" in full, is
invited to attend a yeshiva, where he can study this and many other
holy books in the original".
Thus, one of the leaders of the Russian Jewish community recognizes
some of the laws in the Jewish codex of law as insulting to the non-
Jewish populace of Russia, yet he considers it possible to invite his
kinsmen to study these insults in yeshivas - Jewish schools financed
from the [Federal] government and local budgets. Additionally, even
in this censored edition we find the following laws:
- In "Laws About Idolatry" it is indicated that "the figure of two
crossed sticks, to which they worship, is forbidden to the use" -
meaning that Christianity is considered idolatry and all laws about
dealings with idolaters ("akumam") imply primarely Orthodox
Christians in Russia (which is a predominantly Christian Orthodox
country).
- A law which states that upon seeing "a house of idolatry" (i.e,
temple) one must pronounce towards it a curse: "G-d will uproot the
house of the proud", and at the sight of the destroyed temple to
announce "The G-d of vengeance appeared!". Furthermore, there is also
a version of this law stating: "some assume that the discussion deals
with the houses of non-Jews, which live in peace, calmness and
wealth" (pp. 389-390).
- Comparison of a non-Jews to excrements (pp 47 and 48).
- A prohibition to train non-Jews in crafts (p. 390).
- "A Jewess should not assist a non-Jew in childbirth" (p. 390).
- "If a man has a debt to non-Jew, but the creditor died, he has the
right to refuse to pay to the creditor's son, if the son does not
know accurately whether the Jew owed money to his father" (p. 405).
- In regard to calculations of money "if a non-Jew made a mistake, it
is permitted to benefit from his error" (p. 406).
- "It is forbidden to give over a Jew into the hands of a non-Jew, if
there is a concern about the life of Jew or his property; and it is
irrelevant whether this is being done as a result of any action by
words; and it is forbidden to report him or to indicate the places
where his property is hidden" (p. 408) - we would like to note that
this concerns the behavior obligatory for Jews during a court case
and in a court of law.
- Of course, within the 13 major principles of Judaism it is
obligatory to await a Jewish world ruler, who will place the Jews to
rule over all other nations of the world: "Unconditionally I believe
in the arrival Of Moshiach, and, although he does tarry, nevertheless
each day I will await it" (p. 485). - In the books of the [Russian]
Orthodox Church this expected ruler of the world is identified as the
Antichrist, about whom a warning was given by Jesus Christ (John
5:43), the apostle Paul (2 Thessalonians, 2), the holy fathers of the
Church. This is the important and integral part of the [Russian]
Orthodox tradition.
In the prefacen to this book, the head of CJROU writes that "the
Talmud is an unsurpassed monument of the Jewish genius", and this
extract of its morals, "Kitzur Shulchan Oruch" - "a compendum of the
Jewish civilization of our time... This book is very necessary for
you. You can act according to what is written in it, and be assured
that have fulfilled the will of G-d".
And the chief rabbi of Russia, A. Shayevich, notes in the
preface: "Interest in this book has exceeded our our most daring
expectations. We have received a huge quantity of thankful responses
from very different people during this time. An even larger quantity
of letters contain imperative requests to help with the purchase of
this publication".
We assume that already on the basis of this single official Jewish
publication and article 282 of UK RF [Criminal Codex of the Russian
Federation], the law enforcement agencies should have suppressed the
propagation of a religion among the Jews kindling the hatred for rest
of the Russian populace. All the more, if we glance into "the full
volume of this unsurpassed monument of Judaic morals" - the "Shulchan
Aruch", studied in yeshivas.
Lets utilize its translation from a Jewish Amsterdam edition, made by
a judicial expert, a scientist and a Hebraist, doctor K. Ecker for
the court trial in Germany in 1883 (Dr. K. Ecker. Der "Judenspiegel"
im Lichte der Wahrheit, - eine wissentschaftliche Untersuchung.
Paderborn. 1984; Russian translation: Dr. K. Ecker. "Jewish Mirror"
in light of the truth. Scientific research. M., 1906).
The Jews begun this law case in connection with the fact that one of
their kinsmen (Yustus-Briman), after conversion to Christianity,
published the anti-human laws of the "Shulhan Oruch" and of the
Talmud. However, the court vindicated the publisher after finding
that the translation corresponded to the original. Dr. Ecker only
corrected small inaccuracies - the text corrected by him will be
brought down below in fragments with the indication of precise Jewish
sources (being based on the confidence of the qualification of German
expert-Hebraist and the German court).
- "His [the non-Jew's] seed is considered as the seed of cattle"
(Tosefta - addition to the Talmud Of Ketubot, 3b). "For [the dead]
servants and mainservants ... they do not say the words of comfort to
those remaining, but it is necessary to say to him [to the Jew, the
owner]: "May G-d recover your loss", in exactly the same way just as
they tell a man, when either his bull or donkey dies" (Yoreh Deah 377-
1)
- "It is forbidden to save them [the non-Jews], when they are close
to death. For example, when you see, that one of them fell in the
sea, do not rescue him, even if he wants to pay... It is permitted to
experiment with medicine on a non-Jew to determine whether it is
useful or not" (Yoreh Deah 158-1).
- "The money of non-Jews is consided as if it is unowned, and anyone
who grabs it first can take it". "With respect to a non-Jew there is
no lying" (Hoshen Mishpat 156-5, Hagah; 227-26; 348-2, Hagah).
- "When a Jew robbed a non-Jew, and he [the Jew] is being forced to
swear, he must declare in his heart the oath as ineffective, because
he is being forced" (Yoreh Deah, 329-1, Hagah). NOTE: this again
concerns the behavior of Jews during a court case and in a courtroom,
- "If it is established about someone that he betrayed a Jew or his
money to non-Jew three times, then it is necessary to seek out a way
and methods to kill him". "The expenses necessary for the removal of
the traitor from this world is liable on all local residents" (Hoshen
Mishpat 388-15 and -16).
- "A traitor - it is permitted to kill him at any place, even in our
time. To kill him is permissible before he manages to inform [liable
to bring a loss "either bodily or monetary even if it is small]...
and anyone, who is the first to kill him acquires merit" (Hoshen
Mishpat 388-10).
- "A Jew-free-thinker, i.e. someone who performs the religious rites
of the non-Jews ... to kill all of these is a good deed. When there
is authority to kill them, they are publically executed by sword; but
if not, then they must be enmeshed in every way possible in order to
cause them death. For example, when you see, that one of them fell
into the well and in the well there are stairs, then hurry to take
out them out saying: "I needed it to take my son off the roof, and I
will bring it right back" and etc" (Hoshen 425-5).
PROVOCATEURS AND HATERS OF HUMANKIND
It is notable that even the above mention orders to kill are not -
are to this day not theory but practice. Thus, the former chairman of
the Kharkov Jewish community, E. Khodos, published proofs ("The Axe
above the Orthodoxy, or Who Killed Father Menya". Kharkov, 1999)
charing the members of the Jewish Chabad movement in the murder in
1990 of a Jewish priest, Father Alexsander Menya (which "perfomed the
religious rites of the non-Jews" and dreamed about the creation of
the "Jewish Orthodox Church", which is also considered a criminal
offense according to the laws of state of Israel). But these
testimonies did not interest the authorities of the RF [the Russian
Federation] and instead it was proposed that the criminals can be
found among the community of the Russian anti-semites.
Let us emphasize, that most of anti-Jewish actions in the entire
world are constantly arranged by the Jews themselves with the
provocative purpose - in order to invoke punitive measures against
patriots. In Russia, the most famous is the case of Norinskiy, which
in 1988 sent antisemitic leaflets on behalf of the
organization "Pamyat", in order to compel the authorities to repress
it; he was helped by his kisnman, editor in chief of the
journal "Znamya" G. Baklanov, who published the leaflet in a half-
million printing. Only after this provocation was discovered
("Znamya" No. 10, 1988; "Pravda", 19.11.88; "Komsomolskya Pravda",
24.11.88; "Ogonek" No. 9, 1989).
Among the more recent cases, we can mention a strange series of the
reports of vandalism in 1998-1999: On 13 of May, 1998, in Moscow
there was a night explosion of synagogue in Mariynoy Rosche (a wall
was damaged), during the same day not far from the synagogue v
Otradnom there was an incident with "a burning canister of gasoline",
and in Irkutsk "a Jewish cemetery was vandalised". Of course, the
world media raised a loud rackus and all of these were uproveningly
thought of being caused by certain Russian Nazis ("Nezavisimya
Gazeta", 15.5.98).
But when soon after this, in 1999, a synagogue was destroyed in
Birobidzhan and a court established that Jews themselves hired a man
for this ("Radonezh", 1999, No. 15-16), the democratic media was
silent.
Based on the cited laws and practices of Jewish behavior is not
difficult to understand, why notorious "antisemitism" was a constant
companion of the Jews among all nations, i.e., the nonacceptance of
of Judaic morals. For this very reason Jews did not have an equality
of rights in Christian states and only attained it only as a result
of anti-monarchist bourgeois revolutions.
And in the Russian Empire ,Jews, after the useless attempts of the
tsarist government to make them "the same as everyone else", were
deprived in the 19th century of the equality of rights: not because
they were Jews by blood (the empire was multinational); not because
they were non-Christian (so were Moslems, Buddhists and so forth.);
but because the Jewish religion is anti-Christian and human-hating,
reaching as far as ritual murders. Many cases of this extremism were
proven in court (for example, see a study by a well-known scholar V.
I. Dal "Rozyskaniye O Ubiyenii Yevremyimi Christianskih Mladentsev i
Ispolzovanya Ih Krovi" [Investigation of Murders of Christian Babies
by Jews and the Use of Their Blood], St. Petersburg, 1884).
To all of this, we can also add words from the prayer Of "Shfoch",
which which the Jews say on the eve of Passover, asking that their "G-
d" "destroys from under the sun" all other nations.
JUDAIC AGGRESSIVENESS AS A FORM OF SATANISM
The spiritual reason for this misanthropy is explained in the Gospels
through the words of Christ about the Jewish spiritual leaders,
rejecting the son of the God: "Your father is the devil, and you want
to fulfill the lusts of your father; he was a murderer of man from
the beginning" (John 8:19,44).
This is the accepted (in the [Russian] Orthodoxy) explanation of
Jewish aggressiveness as a form of satanism. It was voiced by well-
known philosophers-intellectuals, who cannot be suspected in the
antisemitism. For example, A. F. Losev ("Istochnik". M., 1996, No. 4.
S. 117-122), Father Pavel Florenskiy (see the book V. V.
Rozanov "Saxharna", publishing house "Respublika", 1998, p. 360) and
Father Sergiy Bulgakov: the Jews who rejected Christ became "the
laboratory of all kind of all kinds of spiritual defects, poisoning
the world and in particular the Christians" ("Vestnik RXD". Parism
1973, No. 108-110, p. 72). Even Judeo-Christian Father Alexsander
Men, who was fighting against "antisemitism", asserted that the Jew,
who rejects Christianity, "betrays himself and easily falls to in the
authority of the dark forces" (journal "Jews in the USSR", 1975, No.
11).
This, unfortunately has occurred with the larger part of the Jewish
people (in contrast to the smaller part which accepted Christianity).
But they do not want to realize this, and considers that this
statement of truth by Christ and the [Russian] Orthodox Christians
after him "insulting" to the Jews. Jewish plaintiffs frequently
direct their charge of "antisemitism" against this essential part of
the Orthodox dogma, requiring its practical prohibition (as in the
case with the textbook "Bases of Orthodox Culture").
However, we cannot agree with the prohibition on the [Russian]
Orthodox knowledge about the purpose of history as the fight between
the forces of good (on the side of the Church) and forces of evil (on
the side of the opposite religion, that is preparing the reign of
Antichrist).
Following the precepts of the [Russian] Orthodox fathers of the
Church, we cannot follow the forced false understanding of tolerance
as humbleness before the sin, the evil, the heresies and in this case
satanism. From the respect for the image of God, placed into every
person, and for the salvation of his soul, a Christian must frankly
tell to to Jews their dangerous deviation from the truth into
satanism - from a Christian point of view in this lies the
manifestation of authentic love for people, BUT "tolerant" indulgence
to heresies and to satanism only contributes to their spiritual loss.
And under their strong pressure - also of their many victims.
We should note immediately to answer a the possible objection that
the Russian patriots, who charge the Jews, do not always
differentiate between the religious and non-religious Jews,
especially since majority of them are not considered themselves
religious and do not study the "Shulchan Oruch". However, many
generations of the self-contained life of the Jews among the other
nations (in this there was the sense of Jewish saying of "a state
within the state" - see the books of the Jewish
authors: "Antisemitism in the Ancient World", S. Luria and "Kniga
Kagala", Y. Brofman) led to the fact that the morals of the "Shulchan
Oruch" have became a part of Jewish national self-consciousness even
in its secular form. This conclusion drawn by a known Jewish writer
and sociologist X. Arendt:
"Precisely in the process of secularization a real Jewish chauvinism
was born... The idea about the uniqueness of the Jews became... an
idea, that the Jews are supposedly the salt of the earth. From this
point on, the old religious concept of uniqueness ceased to be the
essence of Judaism and became the essence of Jewish people"
("Antisemitism", "Syntaxsis", Paris, No. 26, 1989).
This "real Jewish chauvinism" and unceremoniousness in the spirit of
the "Shulchan Oruch" clearly appeared in the course of the
destruction of the USSR and the post-communist reforms in our
country, and were expressed as in the illegal awarding to the
government ownership both in the illegal aquisition of government
property as "unowned" and in the composition of the new ruling
class: "the government it is full of Jews", admits Rabbi A. Shayevich
("NG-Figuri I Litza", 1998, No. 16). Thus, their corresponding
influence on the life of the country proved to be completely
disproportionately to their number (0.16 % according to the last
census) to the detriment of the interests of all other nationalities
of the country and especially the country-forming Russian people.
THE JEWISH REVOLUTION
A famout Jewish pamphleteer L. Radzikhovskiy calls this a "democratic-
capitalist revolution"... "Jewish and near-Jewish intelligentsia in
Russia, which was one of the main carriers of the western-liberal
ideology, became the ideologist of this revolution". Therefore "Jews
have a larger specific weight in the Russian policy and business,
than in the policy and business of any other Christian country". This
Radzikhovskiy calls "Jewish happiness", which is also the title of
his newspaper article ("Novoye Ruskoye Slovo", 17.1.96).
The Jewish oligarchs themselves frankly described on Israeli
television (Channel 2, 3.10.96) the sources of their "happiness" in
the revolution perfomed by them (the italics are ours):
The degree of corruption in Russia fully corresponds to the degree of
changes in Russia. I do not think that in the hands of the officials
of Israel... there is an ability to redistribute riches costing tens,
hundreds of millions and billions... this was - no one's, this was -
the state, this was property of all! Thus, the officials had the
ability to decide by one stroke: this belongs to you or to someone
else... A good battle, which led to the result, which we have today"
(Berezovskiy).
"Such income and such profits, as the ones that could be earned in
Russia, could not be earned anywhere else... The large part of
capital there, 50 percent, belong to Jewish business " (Malkin, now
the member of the presidium of Russian Jewish Congress).Gusinskiy,
first Chairman of the Russian Jewish congress, in the same program
named a number of reasons for the Jewish luck - "harshness", "with
less rules: more rule of force, more rule of aggression".
"For the first time in a thousand years from the moment of the
settling of Jews in Russia we obtained real authority in this
country", says another Jewish writer, E. Topol, in "An open letter To
Berezovsky, Gusinsky, Smolensky, Khodorkovsky and Other Oligarchs"
("Argumenti I Fakti", 1998, No. 38). With this, Topol and other
sensitive Jews (for example, Y. Nudelman - see. "Sovetskaya Rosiya",
20.6.2002) emphasize that the destructive and self-interested policy
of the Jewish oligarchs, which degrades Russian people, provokes the
hostility of the Russian people to the Jews. This obviousness was
even noted by the ambassador of the Kingdom of Belgium in RF [the
Russian Federation], A. Merne, in a concluding report about his work,
sent out to all foreign embassies in Moscow and employees of the
diplomatic sector, during September 2004 before his departure from
Moscow.
We request the General Procurator's Office to consider this opinion
of Topol and Nudelman as the acknowledgement of the responsibility of
the accusing (Jewish) side for the contemporary aggravation of the
Russian-Jewish conflict.
More so, that for the retention of illegally seized "unowned"
government property and to maintain its authority, this ruling class
conducts a directed policy of the lowering of national morals and
removal of intellectual values, attempting to convert the populace
into an animal mass without any faith and traditions - so more
simpler to govern and with ability to more easily suppress its
resistance.
In particular, it was specifically the Jews who showed furious
resistance to the teaching in schools of "Osnov Pravoslavnay Kulturi"
[a textbook called the "Bases of Russian Orthodox Culture] and
specifically on the initiative of the Jews, it is forbidden to us,
the country-forming Russian people, to indicate our nationality in a
passport. The chief rabbi R. F. Shayevich in an interview with
the "Los Angeles Times" confirmed that it was the Jews who insisted
on the cancellation of the nationality section [in the passport], and
the reason for this was explained that"the Jews acquired high
positions in the administration". I.e., even they themselves realize
the idea about nationality that is accepted among the non-Jews, and
therefore they attempt to hide their nationality - this alone speaks
volumes.
Among the other numerous examples of removal of intellectual values
we cannot but turn your attention, Mr. Prosecutor General, to the
policy of the Minister of culture Mr. Shvydkog (he is now in charge
of the government agency for the matters of culture) and his TV
program "Cultural Revolution", in which Russian patriotism and
[Russian] Orthodox traditions are regularly degraded, in which he
propagandizes obscenities and the idea that "sex is the engine of
culture" (7.3.2002). All protests of the Russian community against
the scandalous, and in the essence provocative activity of this "main
cultural man of the country" proved to be futile.
Additionally, Mr. Shvydkog and his colleagues have at their disposal
the central channels of Russian television, and in the hands of the
defending [Russian] Orthodox patriots there is only small print runs
available, for which they are pursued and judged - this inequality of
abilities can also involuntarily lead them to extra emotionalism,
especially when rebuffing blasphemous and insolent anti-Russian
actions of persons of Jewish origin.
But this emotionalism of cornered defending side, should not be mixed
up with the aggressive attacking emotionalism. The aggression is not
permitted for a [Russian] Orthodox person, but he is called to
protect his people and its sacred relics - an example to this was
given by Christ himself, who banished merchants by whip from the
temple which they defiled/
WHAT IS PERMITTED FOR WHOM?
By comparison with the statements of the accused Russian patriots
much the more aggressive statements of Jews with respect to the non-
Jews are printed in Jewish newspapers published in the RF [Russian
Federation]. For example, in the organ of Russian Jewish
Congress, "The Jewish News" (2002, No. 16, p. 9), the deputy of the
[Israeli] Knesset A. Lieberman called to the forcefully expell
Palestinians from Israel. Nevertheless, the Palestinians - in spite
of the resolutions of the UN Security Council! - are not only being
banished from their native land (4 million refugees), but their
activists together with familiar are being killed - this is how
the "Shulchan Oruch" manifests itself in the official government
policy of the state of Israel.
And the Jewry of the RF [the Russian Federation] supports it: the
Russian Jewish Congress among its goals declares, that it "carries
out actions of solidarity with the people of Israel, political
lobbying of interests of Israel" ("Jewish News", 2002, No. 15, p. 5).
This purpose is also pursued by the State Institute of Study of
Israel and the Middle East, whose leader Satanovskiy is
simultaneously heading the Russian Jewish congress.
Jewish communities in all countries are carring out a
similar "political lobbying" of interests of the international Jewry
to the detriment of their resident countries, and especially in THE
USA - this state became the tool of achieving the global goals of
Jewry. And the racism of their "Shulchan Oruch" they try to disguise
by the forestalling charges of antisemitism (i.e., allegedly racial
hatred) to all who do not agree with their morals, their actions,
their wars.
But this substitution of concepts is a crude forgery, which must be
obvious to any impartial judge. It is possible to say that the entire
democratic world today is under the monetary and political control by
the international Jewry, which is something famous bankers (Z.
Attali, etc.) are openly proud of. And we do not wish that our
Russia, against the revival of which a preventive permanent war
without the rules is being wages, end up among such non-free
countries.
Therefore, we, both for purposes of the protection of our Fatherland
and personal self-defense, are forced to turn to you, Mr. Prosecutor
General, with the imperative request within the shortest period to
verify the scandalous facts presented above and, if they are
confirmed, on the basis of the corresponding articles UK RF [Criminal
Codex of the Russian Federation], the law "About opposition to
extremist activity" (2002) and article. 13 of the Constitution of the
RF [the Russian Federation] ("the establishment and the activities of
public associations, whose aims and actions are directed at ... the
incitement of social, racial, national and religious strife shall be
prohibited.") to officially begin proceedings about the prohibition
in our country of all religious and national Jewish associations as
extremist. The persons, responsible for assignment to these
associations of state and municipal property, privileges and state
financing, we request also to be summoned, disregarding of the posts
occupied by them.
Klikov V.M., Nationally honored artist of Russia
Krutov A.N., Deputy of the State Duma, the editor in chief of the
journal "Ruskiy Dom"
Senin A.A., editor in chief of the newspaper "Ruskiy Vestnik"
Nazarov M.V., leader of publishing house "Ruskaya Ideya"
Dushenov K.Y., editor in chief of newspaper "Rus Pravoslavnya"
Khatyushin V. V., deputy editor in chief "Molodaya Gvardia"
Dzikovitskiy A.V. , editor in chief of the newspaper "Kazachiy Vzglad"
Basov T.G. , editor in chief of newspaper "Marsh Slavanki"
Kalent'ev V.F. , editor in chief of the newspaper "Otchizna"
and others (a total of more than 500 signatures, among them 19
Deputies of the State Duma)
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home